STCC Article Series explores ideas, insights, and perspectives shaping the Swiss-Thai business landscape.
Featuring voices from industry leaders and experts, the series aims to spark meaningful conversations and offers fresh views on the issues, trends, and opportunities relevant to the community.
Thailand’s Competitive Edge:
Is Thailand Still The Right Investment Destination?
Featured and based solely on an interview with Prof. Dr. Pavida Pananond
Conducted and written by the Swiss-Thai Chamber of Commerce
Asking whether Thailand is still the right investment destination could become an endless debate. There is no obvious answer. It boils down to which direction Thailand takes its next steps and to which destinations those paths will lead.
Thailand’s success as an investment destination in Southeast Asia is something to be recognised but not to be taken for granted. As the region becomes increasingly competitive, the momentum built through decades of growth and established strengths cannot be allowed to turn into complacency. The question is no longer simply what has made Thailand successful, but how the country can continue to build on that success, stay competitive, and remain an attractive destination for investment.
Against this backdrop, Thailand has much to build on. Its maturity, breadth, and depth of foreign investments, together with established strengths in industrial processing, manufacturing, automotive, and electronics, have helped shape its position in regional and global markets. At the same time, booming lifestyle industries such as tourism and medical wellness continue to add new dimensions to the economy. Beyond these sectors, Thailand’s appeal as a place to live and work further contributes to a 360-degree ecosystem that makes the country an attractive destination for business. But these advantages, while significant, cannot be viewed as reasons to lie back and sit still; they are foundations that need to be continually strengthened as the competitive landscape evolves.
The question then becomes: what exactly should Thailand focus on?
The answer may not lie in a single missing industry, infrastructure, or capability. Thailand already has so much in place, but a head start is only valuable if it is used to stay ahead. Past success has given the country considerable momentum, but momentum, once gained, still needs to be sustained. The challenge is therefore not simply to preserve what Thailand has, but to keep refining, adapting, and pushing its strengths further; before its very advantages that once set it apart become the very things that hold it back.
The complacency of past success.
Thailand is, in many ways, a mature market. It has long-established supply chains and companies that know how to produce, process, and operate within global industries. Automotive and electronics remain important examples, while agribusiness has produced globally active companies.
This maturity is part of Thailand’s competitive edge. It creates momentum. There are established economic zones such as the EEC, logistics infrastructure such as Laem Chabang, and a business ecosystem that has accumulated over decades of foreign investment. Bangkok’s position as a globally connected city and Thailand’s geographical location add further layers to that ecosystem.
Yet the same maturity can create a certain comfort.
The Thai idea of “sabuy sabuy”, or the relaxed and accommodating nature, may be part of what makes the country appealing as a place to live and visit. But viewed through the lens of competitiveness, it raises another question: does comfort dull the drive to go further?
Thailand’s regional neighbours are moving in different ways. Vietnam serves as a new kid on the block, developing as a newer investment destination; Malaysia has established strengths in electronics and semiconductors; Singapore continues to develop R&D-intensive sectors, while Indonesia brings significant natural resources to industries such as automotive.
The comparison is not about who is ahead. It is about what each market can offer and whether Thailand is clear enough about what makes its own offer difficult to replace.
Looking beyond the next big industry.
Thailand’s response to changing competition has often been to identify the next promising industry and position itself as a “hub”: AI, data centres, semiconductors, medical equipment, and other emerging sectors.
But this way of looking at competitiveness can sometimes obscure a simpler question: “What are we already doing, and how can we become better at it?”
Rather than viewing Thailand’s competitiveness through individual industries, it may be more useful to look horizontally across the value chain. Where are Thai companies already participating? What activities do they consistently do well? And what capabilities could be strengthened across different industries?
One of Thailand’s less fashionable strengths may provide a clue: processing and production.
Thailand has developed considerable expertise in producing and processing within established technologies, supporting global industries through capabilities built over time. Rather than asking which new sector Thailand should enter, the opportunity may lie in understanding what allows Thai businesses to perform well in these areas and how those capabilities can be strengthened and applied across industries.
This means looking at the value chain not simply by industry or product, but by what Thailand can do well within that value chain.
What skills have allowed certain companies to succeed? What can those skills be applied to? And how can Thai suppliers become more reliable, sophisticated, and difficult to replace?
Jewellery is one example. It may not carry the same attention as AI, but Thailand already has capabilities in the sector. The opportunity, then, may not simply be to promote jewellery as another “hub” but to strengthen the upstream capabilities, attract more technology and investment upstream, develop downstream distribution channels, and allow Thai businesses to control more of the value chain rather than remain dependent on foreign companies for technology and sales.
The same thinking can apply elsewhere.
Consider Thai textiles. Thailand has high-quality traditional textiles, but a product does not necessarily become globally competitive simply because it is recognisably Thai. The challenge may be to develop Thai textile capabilities and technology to a level where the material can be used by international brands, where it can stand on its own quality and functionality without having to visibly “look Thai”.
That distinction matters. It shifts the focus from following the next big trend to building capabilities that last.
The danger of constantly chasing the next S-curve is that Thailand risks treating every new sector as a race it needs to join, rather than asking what it can make uniquely valuable. The semiconductor or data centre may be the headline, but the less visible network of capable suppliers, technology, production expertise, and reliable processes can determine whether investment takes root.
This is where the conversation comes back to foreign investments. Foreign investment will remain an important part of Thailand’s economic ecosystem, but as global investment decisions become increasingly complex, attracting companies to Thailand is only part of the equation. The question is how to give them compelling reasons to stay.
If Thailand can continually strengthen the capabilities that sit underneath the industries already operating here, foreign investment can become “sticky”. Companies should not simply choose Thailand because it is currently an attractive location; they should find it increasingly difficult to replace Thailand because of the capabilities, suppliers, and ecosystem that have developed around their operations.
This brings Thai businesses back to the fundamentals: understanding what they are already doing well and how those strengths can be developed further. Becoming a global player cannot rely solely on foreign companies bringing in investment and technology. Thailand must also take the initiative to strengthen Thai suppliers, improve the capabilities it already possesses, and move into more valuable positions within the global value chain. The objective is not simply to attract the next investment, but to make the investments already here, and the Thai businesses supporting them, increasingly difficult to replace.
Doing the homework
A mature market, like Thailand, does not necessarily need to chase every new trend. But it does need to understand where its existing capabilities sit within an increasingly fragmented global value chain, and what it would take to move further along that chain.
That requires looking beyond individual products and sectors to the activities underneath them: skills, suppliers, technology, traceability, quality, competition, and the ability of Thai companies to develop capabilities of their own. It means understanding not only where Thailand participates, but why companies choose to rely on Thailand and what would make that reliance stronger over time.
It also raises broader questions around transparency, rule of law, governance, and the conditions needed for businesses to compete on a level playing field. These may not be the most exciting questions to ask. But for a market that already has so much in place, they may be the questions that matter most.
So, is Thailand moving in the right direction?
There is no definitive answer.
Thailand’s competitive edge spans many areas, but established strengths do not remain strengths automatically. Other markets are developing their own capabilities, and multinational companies have more choices about where to locate, source, and invest. The question is therefore not simply whether Thailand is competitive today, but whether it is doing enough to remain difficult to replace tomorrow.
Perhaps the more important question is not simply whether Thailand is moving in the right direction to chase new sectors, but how it can build on the one it has already taken. For Thai businesses to remain relevant to global growth and foreign investment, it may be time to do some housekeeping and ask the important questions that past success may have allowed us to avoid.